CUI · 6927635 · J4029141/1994 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ROMAVO COM S.R.L.
Str. EMIL GARLEANU, Nr. 10, Bl. A 2, Sc. 3, Et. P, Ap. 55
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 31144
ANAF Live Status
Synced 8d agoInactivat: 29 Jun 2017
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- C🇷🇴Administrator
C**** H**** V****
Revenue · 2013
N/A
Net Profit · 2013
0 RON
Employees · 2013
0
Equity · 2013
-15.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
31144
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- -3.98
- RE / TA
- -6.19
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.86
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2013
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | 0 -100.0% | 18.111 +0.0% | — | 2.545 +0.0% | -15.566 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | 1.661 +0.1% | 882 +0.0% | 2 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 2.745 | 18.111 | — | 2.544 | -15.567 | 2.745 | 1.660 | 882 | 2 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 0 | 2.745 | 0 | 0 |