CUI · 33604488 · J4010913/2014 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
PETROSTYLE SRL
Str. ALEEA CETATEA VECHE, Nr. 2A, Bl. 2BIS, Sc. C, Et. 1, Ap. 36
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 01 Aug 2025
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- I🇷🇴Administrator
I**** P****
Revenue · 2020
0 RON
Net Profit · 2020
-150 RON
Employees · 2020
N/A
Equity · 2020
-70.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2018
- WC / TA
- -16378.53
- RE / TA
- -23465.00
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -1.00
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2020)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 0 | 0 | 70.582 +0.2% | 0 | 0 | -70.582 -0.2% | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 150 -37.0% | 0 | 150 -37.0% | 150 -37.0% |
| 2019 | 0 | 0 | 70.432 +0.3% | 0 | 0 -100.0% | -70.432 -0.3% | — | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 238 +0.0% | 0 | 238 +0.0% | 238 +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0 | 0 | 70.198 +0.3% | 0 | 3 +0.0% | -70.195 -0.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 238 | 0 | 238 | 238 |
| 2017 | 0 | 0 | 69.960 -2.8% | 0 | 3 -99.9% | -69.957 -2.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 3 -76.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 71.957 -0.1% | 0 | 3.680 -2.6% | -68.277 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 3.667 +0.0% | 13 -88.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% |
| 2015 | 3.026 +247.0% | 26.163 -38.2% | 72.057 +58.6% | 0 -100.0% | 3.780 +38.5% | -68.277 -62.1% | — | 0 | 3.667 +63.6% | 113 -76.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 3.026 +247.0% | 29.098 -32.6% | 0 | 26.072 -38.4% | 0 | 1 +0.0% |
| 2014 | 872 | 42.314 | 45.442 | 598 | 2.730 | -42.114 | — | — | 2.242 | 488 | — | — | — | 200 | 872 | 43.171 | 0 | 42.299 | 0 | 1 |