CUI · 32881928 · J402681/2014 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
EPPS BEAUTY FACTORY SRL
Str. ALEXANDRU MORUZZI VOIEVOD, Nr. 4A, Et. 2, Ap. 7
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 18d agoInactivat: 26 Oct 2020
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- V🇷🇴Legal Representative
V**** C****
Revenue · 2015
N/A
Net Profit · 2015
246.5K RON
Employees · 2015
246.5K
Equity · 2015
-513.2K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- -1.38
- RE / TA
- -1.46
- EBIT / TA
- 1.37
- Eq / Liab
- -0.59
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2015
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | — | 246.454 -7.7% | 863.939 +63.6% | 227.060 +28.1% | 121.361 +45.0% | -513.220 -92.4% | 246.454 -7.7% | 78.642 +91.5% | 41.182 -1.7% | 1.537 +107.7% | 2.298 +360.5% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 234.922 | 235.214 +4623.2% | 481.668 +77.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 266.966 | 528.184 | 177.194 | 83.725 | -266.766 | 266.966 | 41.071 | 41.914 | 740 | 499 | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 4.980 | 271.946 | 0 | 0 |