CUI · 31037387 · J4015073/2012 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
QUALITY MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION SRL
Șos. GIURGIULUI, Nr. 131, Bl. 1, Sc. 1, Et. 5, Ap. 19
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 40665
ANAF Live Status
Synced 18d agoInactivat: 02 May 2019
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- B🇷🇴Administrator
B**** C****
Revenue · 2017
11.6K RON
Net Profit · 2017
-22.7K RON
Employees · 2017
1
Equity · 2017
-32.2K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
40665
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -2.32
- RE / TA
- -3.43
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.77
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 11.555 -92.4% | 0 -100.0% | 41.640 +40.9% | 2.237 -21.9% | 7.213 -58.1% | -32.190 -240.0% | 1 +0.0% | — | 6.761 -40.9% | 452 -82.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 11.556 -92.5% | 33.933 -74.5% | 0 -100.0% | 22.377 | 22.723 |
| 2016 | 153.013 -14.9% | 16.493 -85.2% | 29.550 -53.1% | 2.866 -15.9% | 17.217 -48.9% | -9.467 +63.5% | 1 | 3.122 | 11.446 +4.4% | 2.649 -88.3% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 154.361 -46.1% | 133.232 | 21.129 -80.1% | 0 | 0 -100.0% |
| 2015 | 179.838 | 111.804 | 63.063 +284.6% | 3.408 +17836.8% | 33.695 -71.9% | -25.960 -125.1% | — | — | 10.959 +47.4% | 22.736 -79.8% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 179.834 | 286.247 +16.3% | 0 -100.0% | 106.409 -21.6% | 0 -100.0% | 1 -100.0% |
| 2014 | — | 0 | 16.395 -23.2% | 19 -24.0% | 119.720 +47.5% | 103.344 +72.7% | 0 | — | 7.435 +743600.0% | 112.285 +38.4% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 246.191 +168.7% | 246.197 +168.7% | 135.708 +367.4% | 110.489 +76.5% | 103.104 +72.3% |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 21.358 | 25 | 81.158 | 59.825 | 0 | — | -1 | 81.159 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 91.625 | 91.626 | 29.035 | 62.591 | 59.842 |