CUI · 30366608 · J407454/2012 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
OLD STYLE HUNTING SRL
Str. PRINCIPATELE UNITE, Nr. 38-40, Et. PARTER, Ap. 2(R1)
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 11d agoInactivat: 21 Nov 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- B🇮🇹Administrator
B**** E**** V****
- S🇮🇹Administrator
S**** F****
Revenue · 2016
N/A
Net Profit · 2016
-366 RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
94.5K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.61
- RE / TA
- 0.44
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 0.80
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 118.176 +0.0% | — | 212.676 +0.0% | 94.500 -0.4% | — | 104.139 +0.0% | 68.643 +0.0% | 39.894 +0.0% | — | — | — | 870 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 366 | 0 -100.0% | 366 | 366 |
| 2015 | 8.975 | 11.090 -59.6% | 118.176 +7.2% | 366 -57.1% | 212.676 -1.2% | 94.866 -10.5% | — | 104.139 +0.0% | 68.643 +15.7% | 39.894 -23.1% | — | — | — | 870 +0.0% | 8.975 | 19.792 +1185.2% | 0 -100.0% | 10.817 -62.7% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 27.422 | 110.261 -5.2% | 853 -36.4% | 215.363 -13.3% | 105.955 -20.6% | 27.468 | 104.139 +0.0% | 59.345 +0.0% | 51.879 -38.9% | — | — | — | 870 +0.0% | — | 1.540 -98.6% | 1.540 -98.6% | 28.962 -60.4% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 116.291 -1.2% | 1.342 -34.2% | 248.372 +9.1% | 133.423 +19.1% | 0 | 104.139 +39.7% | 59.329 +90.8% | 84.904 -30.4% | — | — | — | 870 +0.0% | — | 111.115 -57.0% | 111.225 -57.0% | 73.196 -47.6% | 38.029 -68.0% | 34.692 -68.8% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 117.717 | 2.040 | 227.658 | 111.981 | 0 | 74.527 | 31.091 | 122.040 | — | — | — | 870 | — | 258.526 | 258.547 | 139.679 | 118.868 | 111.111 |