CUI · 30296367 · J408312/2017 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
CRAMA CASA DI VINO SRL
Str. POIANA CU ALUNI, Nr. 6, Bl. 17, Sc. 3, Et. 4, Ap. 89
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 22875
ANAF Live Status
Synced 2d agoInactivat: 12 Apr 2018
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- M🇷🇴Administrator
M**** A***
- D🇷🇴Legal Representative
D**** M**** - I****
Revenue · 2016
N/A
Net Profit · 2016
-133 RON
Employees · 2016
1
Equity · 2016
-38.4K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
22875
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- -5.43
- RE / TA
- -8.23
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.89
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 43.106 -2.2% | — | 4.692 -19.0% | -38.414 -0.3% | 1 | 2.139 +0.0% | 2.644 +0.6% | -91 -108.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 133 | 0 -100.0% | 133 | 133 +13200.0% |
| 2015 | 4.280 | 272 -97.4% | 44.074 -3.0% | — | 5.793 -16.6% | -38.281 -0.7% | — | 2.139 -23.4% | 2.627 -27.9% | 1.027 +102.2% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 4.280 | 4.424 -4.5% | 0 -100.0% | 144 -99.0% | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | — | 10.462 -41.1% | 45.431 +19.3% | 477 -91.7% | 6.945 +40.2% | -38.009 -38.7% | 10.601 -42.3% | 2.791 +65.3% | 3.646 +20.5% | 508 +110.8% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 4.632 -79.5% | 4.656 -79.7% | 15.118 -62.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 17.755 +91.9% | 38.087 +139.8% | 5.725 +1734.9% | 4.954 -24.1% | -27.408 -202.9% | 18.358 +98.5% | 1.688 -17.8% | 3.025 +282.4% | 241 -93.4% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 22.550 +101.2% | 22.975 +102.5% | 40.730 +97.8% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 9.250 | 15.885 | 312 | 6.523 | -9.050 | 9.250 | 2.053 | 791 | 3.679 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 11.208 | 11.345 | 20.595 | 0 | 0 |