CUI · 30125642 · J404824/2012 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
STORM SISTEMS SRL
Șos. PANTELIMON, Nr. 74, Bl. 411, Sc. A, Et. 4, Ap. 15
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 21634
ANAF Live Status
Synced 13d agoInactivat: 11 Nov 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- D🇷🇴Administrator
D**** R****
Revenue · 2017
0 RON
Net Profit · 2017
0 RON
Employees · 2017
0
Equity · 2017
-1.5K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
21634
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2017
- WC / TA
- -0.79
- RE / TA
- -1.78
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.61
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2017
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 0 | 0 | 2.432 +0.0% | 0 | 950 +0.0% | -1.482 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 950 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 | 2.432 +18.1% | 0 | 950 +0.0% | -1.482 -33.5% | 0 | 0 | 950 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 372 | 0 | 372 | 372 |
| 2015 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 2.060 +0.0% | 0 | 950 +0.0% | -1.110 +0.0% | — | 0 | 950 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 | 127 -89.7% | 2.060 +17.0% | 0 | 950 +22.1% | -1.110 -12.9% | 127 -89.7% | 0 | 950 +0.0% | 0 +100.0% | — | 0 | 0 | 210 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 127 -89.7% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1.235 | 1.761 +30.9% | 0 | 778 -86.7% | -983 -121.9% | 1.235 | 0 | 950 -83.4% | -172 -243.3% | — | 0 | 0 | 210 +0.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 1.235 -88.2% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | 0 | 0 | 1.345 | 0 | 5.832 | 4.487 | 0 | 0 | 5.712 | 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 210 | 0 | 15.549 | 15.553 | 10.461 | 5.092 | 4.277 |