CUI · 30088536 · J406600/2017 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
MBA OPTICAL VISION SRL
Str. MĂRGEANULUI, Nr. 34, Bl. M11, Sc. 1, Ap. 3
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 51049
ANAF Live Status
Synced 17d agoInactivat: 23 May 2019
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- M🇷🇴Administrator
M**** C**** - V****
- S🇷🇴Administrator
S*** E****
Revenue · 2016
457.1K RON
Net Profit · 2016
-21.4K RON
Employees · 2016
7
Equity · 2016
52.3K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
51049
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.08
- RE / TA
- 0.11
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 0.12
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 457.102 -13.9% | 0 -100.0% | 431.365 +1.7% | 127.971 -43.4% | 341.229 +33.1% | 52.339 -29.0% | 7 | 203.860 +28.3% | 63.246 +15.6% | 74.123 +73.2% | 14.504 -5.2% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 534.568 -5.1% | 555.927 | 0 -100.0% | 21.359 | 21.359 +266887.5% |
| 2015 | 530.836 | 32.295 +291.5% | 424.113 +35.2% | 226.102 +23.0% | 256.404 +15.5% | 73.698 -30.5% | — | 158.891 +4.1% | 54.723 +49.1% | 42.790 +31.3% | 15.305 +10.7% | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 527.360 | 563.131 +44.5% | 0 -100.0% | 32.295 -91.9% | 0 | 8 |
| 2014 | — | 8.249 -89.5% | 313.672 +260.1% | 183.851 +84.3% | 221.987 +113.4% | 105.993 -9.2% | 10.682 -86.9% | 152.689 +213.0% | 36.710 -5.1% | 32.588 +96.4% | 13.827 | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 389.682 +277.1% | 389.739 +277.1% | 397.988 +119.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 78.296 | 87.107 -10.1% | 99.746 -16.2% | 104.036 -40.8% | 116.675 -41.1% | 81.395 | 48.778 +17.2% | 38.669 +16.1% | 16.589 -83.6% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 103.338 -71.8% | 103.338 -72.3% | 181.634 +10.3% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 96.866 | 119.076 | 175.860 | 198.070 | 0 | 41.613 | 33.305 | 100.942 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 366.112 | 373.705 | 164.624 | 209.081 | 197.870 |