CUI · 29002832 · J4010013/2011 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
CENTRUL MEDICAL MELANIA HOTOBOC SRL
Str. APUSULUI, Nr. 35, Bl. D3, Sc. 4, Et. 3, Ap. 38
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 62281
ANAF Live Status
Synced 20d agoInactivat: 29 Sept 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- H🇷🇴Administrator
H**** B****
- H🇷🇴Administrator
H**** M****
Revenue · 2019
0 RON
Net Profit · 2019
0 RON
Employees · 2019
0
Equity · 2019
47.5K RON
Registration
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
62281
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2019
- WC / TA
- 0.95
- RE / TA
- 0.92
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 11.91
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2019
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0 | 0 | 3.989 +0.0% | 0 | 51.516 +0.0% | 47.527 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 51.493 +0.0% | 23 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | — | 0 | 3.989 +0.0% | — | 51.516 +0.0% | 47.527 +0.0% | — | — | 51.493 +0.0% | 23 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 3.989 +0.0% | — | 51.516 +0.0% | 47.527 +0.0% | — | — | 51.493 +0.0% | 23 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | — | 0 | 3.989 +0.0% | — | 51.516 +0.0% | 47.527 +0.0% | — | — | 51.493 +0.0% | 23 +0.0% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 | 0 | 3.989 +0.0% | 0 | 51.516 -0.0% | 47.527 -0.0% | — | 0 | 51.493 -0.0% | 23 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2014 | 0 | 0 | 3.989 -37.3% | 0 | 51.522 +16.4% | 47.533 +25.4% | 0 | 0 | 51.499 +24.2% | 23 -99.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 17.214 -78.4% | 17.214 -78.4% | 7.057 -77.8% | 10.157 -78.8% | 9.641 -78.9% |
| 2013 | 0 | 0 -100.0% | 6.366 -59.3% | 0 -100.0% | 44.258 +476.9% | 37.892 +580.2% | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 41.451 +898.1% | 2.807 -20.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 +0.0% | 0 | 79.635 +86.7% | 79.766 +87.0% | 31.764 -29.7% | 48.002 | 45.783 |
| 2012 | 0 | 2.513 | 15.633 | 70 | 7.672 | -7.891 | 2.513 | 0 | 4.153 | 3.519 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 42.657 | 42.661 | 45.174 | 0 | 0 |