CUI · 28557673 · J406579/2011 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
KAYED GROUP TRADING S.R.L.
Str. GHEORGHE ȚIȚEICA, Nr. 178
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 51759
ANAF Live Status
Synced 11d agoInactivat: 20 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- K🇷🇴Administrator
K**** T****
Revenue · 2015
125.4K RON
Net Profit · 2015
0 RON
Employees · 2015
N/A
Equity · 2015
52.4K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
51759
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2015
- WC / TA
- 0.45
- RE / TA
- -0.50
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 0.56
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2015
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 125.368 | 0 | 93.277 +0.2% | 15.209 -3.5% | 130.491 +71.1% | 52.423 +4985.6% | — | 108.341 +57.9% | 13.639 +81.3% | 8.511 +6933.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 125.368 | 68.110 -70.2% | 57.258 -74.9% | 0 -100.0% | 53.497 +48.3% | — |
| 2014 | — | 0 -100.0% | 93.092 -10.2% | 15.763 -7.8% | 76.256 +36.4% | -1.073 +96.5% | 0 -100.0% | 68.612 +89.0% | 7.523 -12.1% | 121 -98.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 228.486 +171.1% | 228.486 +171.1% | 192.411 +76.5% | 36.075 | 29.567 |
| 2013 | — | 24.759 | 103.620 +63.2% | 17.093 +12.4% | 55.887 +21.2% | -30.640 -1313.3% | 28.473 | 36.297 +1.3% | 8.554 +86.8% | 11.036 +93.8% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 84.274 -19.8% | 84.274 -19.8% | 109.033 +21.2% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 63.489 | 15.208 | 46.113 | -2.168 | 0 | 35.838 | 4.579 | 5.696 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 105.085 | 105.085 | 89.959 | 15.126 | 12.706 |