CUI · 28092314 · J402157/2011 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ROMACO DESIGN S.R.L.
Str. DRUMUL TABEREI, Nr. 37, Bl. Z43, Sc. A, Et. 4, Ap. 28
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 14d agoInactivat: 29 Aug 2025
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- R🇷🇴Administrator
R**** M****
Revenue · 2023
182.3K RON
Net Profit · 2023
34.8K RON
Employees · 2023
1
Equity · 2023
98.8K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2023
- WC / TA
- 0.90
- RE / TA
- 0.64
- EBIT / TA
- 0.32
- Eq / Liab
- 5.85
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2023
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 182.319 +82.6% | 34.806 -63.4% | 16.880 +143.0% | — | 115.691 +17.9% | 98.811 +8.4% | 1 | — | 5.131 -62.9% | 110.560 +31.1% | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 182.320 +82.6% | 145.461 +8221.6% | 36.859 -62.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 99.873 | 95.189 | 6.946 +73.2% | — | 98.125 | 91.179 +2373.8% | — | — | 13.813 | 84.312 | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 99.873 | 1.748 | 98.125 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | — | 0 | 4.010 +0.0% | — | — | -4.010 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 4.010 +0.0% | — | — | -4.010 +0.0% | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4.332 | 4.202 | 4.010 -63.2% | — | — | -4.010 +51.2% | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 4.332 +6668.8% | — | 4.332 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2017 | — | 0 | 10.909 +49.5% | — | 2.697 +0.2% | -8.212 -78.3% | — | — | 2.449 +0.0% | 248 +2.5% | — | — | — | 25.000 +0.0% | — | 64 | 3.668 -33.1% | 0 | 3.604 -34.3% | 3.604 -34.3% |
| 2016 | — | 0 | 7.298 | — | 2.691 | -4.607 | 1 | — | 2.449 | 242 | — | — | — | 25.000 | — | 0 | 5.482 | 0 | 5.482 | 5.482 |