CUI · 23557303 · J405248/2008 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
AVENA BUSINESS GRUP SRL
Șos. MIHAI BRAVU, Nr. 327, Bl. 54, Sc. 2, Et. 8, Ap. 54
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 14 Oct 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- V🇷🇴Legal Representative
V**** E**** - G****
Revenue · 2016
N/A
Net Profit · 2016
-2.1K RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
4.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.81
- RE / TA
- 0.70
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 2.66
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 1.850 +3600.0% | 23 -91.8% | 6.744 -0.3% | 4.917 -29.7% | — | — | 3.182 +0.1% | 3.562 -0.6% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 | 2.074 | 0 -100.0% | 2.074 | 2.074 |
| 2015 | — | 101 -99.8% | 50 | 280 | 6.762 -4.7% | 6.992 -1.4% | 101 -99.8% | — | 3.180 +0.0% | 3.582 -8.5% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 101 -99.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | — | 43.851 +354.8% | 0 -100.0% | — | 7.093 -87.2% | 7.093 -86.9% | 46.985 +307.7% | — | 3.180 -90.9% | 3.913 -80.7% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 104.468 +67.7% | 105.542 +64.2% | 149.393 +102.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 9.642 +10.2% | 1.401 | — | 55.358 -15.6% | 54.077 -17.6% | 11.525 +29.8% | — | 35.056 +0.9% | 20.302 -34.2% | 120 | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 62.305 +362.8% | 64.286 +139.1% | 73.928 +107.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 | 8.751 | 0 | 0 | 65.603 | 65.603 | 8.880 | 0 | 34.731 | 30.872 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 200 | 0 | 13.463 | 26.891 | 35.642 | 0 | 0 |