CUI · 20025670 · J4021257/2006 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
PIPE INTERMED SRL
Str. Barbu Văcărescu, Nr. 101, Et. p, Ap. camera B
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 20272
ANAF Live Status
Synced 19d agoInactivat: 11 Nov 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
2 representatives- G🇷🇴Administrator
G**** A****
- Z🇷🇴Administrator
Z**** P*** F****
Revenue · 2016
N/A
Net Profit · 2016
0 RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
4.1K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
20272
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.83
- RE / TA
- 0.58
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- 3.23
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | — | 0 -100.0% | 1.284 +0.0% | — | 5.429 +0.0% | 4.145 +0.0% | — | — | 3.650 +0.0% | 1.779 +0.0% | — | — | — | 1.000 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 | 0 -100.0% |
| 2015 | 0 | 7.632 -76.9% | 1.284 -57.9% | — | 5.429 -63.4% | 4.145 -64.8% | — | — | 3.650 +0.0% | 1.779 -84.1% | — | — | — | 1.000 +0.0% | — | 7.632 | 0 | 7.632 -76.9% | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | — | 33.050 +2234.0% | 3.053 +3.3% | — | 14.830 -69.0% | 11.777 -73.7% | 33.050 +1428.7% | — | 3.650 -87.2% | 11.180 -42.2% | — | — | — | 1.000 +0.0% | — | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% | 33.050 +26.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 1.416 -90.2% | 2.956 +30.7% | — | 47.783 -3.0% | 44.827 -4.6% | 2.162 -85.0% | — | 28.450 +795.2% | 19.333 -58.0% | — | — | — | 1.000 +0.0% | — | 24.800 | 24.811 | 26.227 +82.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 14.390 | 2.262 | — | 49.251 | 46.989 | 14.390 | — | 3.178 | 46.073 | — | — | — | 1.000 | — | 0 | 0 | 14.390 | 0 | 0 |