CUI · 18809749 · J40655/2015 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
MADI-TRANS EXPRES SRL
B-dul ALEXANDRU OBREGIA, Nr. 28 A, Bl. 2/31, Sc. A, Et. 8, Ap. 32
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ANAF Live Status
Synced 12d agoInactivat: 06 Jul 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- Ţ🇷🇴Administrator
Ţ**** C****
Revenue · 2013
N/A
Net Profit · 2013
-23.0K RON
Employees · 2013
0
Equity · 2013
306.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- 0.36
- RE / TA
- 0.68
- EBIT / TA
- 0.61
- Eq / Liab
- 2.14
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2013
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | — | 0 | 143.691 -10.4% | 127.233 +0.0% | 263.389 -12.0% | 306.924 +8.0% | 0 | 12.977 +13.1% | 161.631 -29.2% | 88.781 +49.4% | 59.993 +233.4% | — | — | 200 | — | 300.233 -48.1% | 301.183 -47.9% | 273.852 -50.4% | 27.331 +3.4% | 22.958 -6.8% |
| 2012 | — | 0 | 160.337 | 127.233 | 299.176 | 284.065 | 0 | 11.477 | 228.260 | 59.439 | 17.993 | — | — | — | — | 578.279 | 578.279 | 551.857 | 26.422 | 24.638 |