CUI · 18393387 · J402605/2006 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
ECOMED CONCEPT SRL
Str. Șoldanului, Nr. 7, Bl. 137, Sc. 1, Et. 7, Ap. 44
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 42042
ANAF Live Status
Synced 22d agoInactivat: 01 Apr 2016
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- N🇷🇴Administrator
N**** A****
Revenue · 2023
N/A
Net Profit · 2023
0 RON
Employees · 2023
N/A
Equity · 2023
-17.6K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
42042
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2013
- WC / TA
- -1.34
- RE / TA
- -2.08
- EBIT / TA
- 5.02
- Eq / Liab
- -0.67
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Current assets
Asset Breakdown (2023)
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | — | — | 17.589 +0.0% | — | — | -17.589 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | — | 4.880 -59.7% | 17.589 -7.0% | — | — | -17.589 -38.4% | 4.880 -61.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | — | — | 4.880 -84.3% | — | — |
| 2013 | — | 12.103 +67138.9% | 18.920 +428.3% | 1.272 | 4.940 +39.2% | -12.708 -38409.1% | 12.675 +70316.7% | — | 3.548 +0.0% | 1.392 | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 19.052 | 19.052 +190420.0% | 31.155 +111167.9% | — | — |
| 2012 | — | 18 | 3.581 | — | 3.548 | -33 | 18 | — | 3.548 | — | — | — | — | 200 | — | 0 | 10 | 28 | 0 | 0 |