CUI · 17804310 · J4012863/2005 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
SWISS TRADE S.R.L.
B-dul Alexandru Ioan Cuza, Nr. 19, Bl. corp A, Et. DEM+P, Ap. 1
BUCUREȘTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 11051
ANAF Live Status
Synced 18d agoInactivat: 02 Feb 2017
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- B🇷🇴Administrator
B**** S**** - C****
Revenue · 2014
N/A
Net Profit · 2014
16.0K RON
Employees · 2014
16.7K
Equity · 2014
-120.1K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCUREȘTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
11051
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2014
- WC / TA
- -11.57
- RE / TA
- -16.98
- EBIT / TA
- 5.47
- Eq / Liab
- -0.94
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2014
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | — | 15.978 +9.5% | 127.216 +17.3% | — | 7.086 +41.2% | -120.130 -16.1% | 16.661 +11.0% | 869 | — | 6.217 +23.9% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 22.777 -19.2% | 22.777 -19.2% | 38.755 -9.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 14.592 +23.6% | 108.486 +18.4% | — | 5.017 +89.2% | -103.469 -16.3% | 15.006 +27.1% | — | — | 5.017 +817.2% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 28.181 -64.4% | 28.181 -65.3% | 42.773 -54.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 11.807 | 91.654 | 0 | 2.651 | -89.003 | 11.807 | 2.104 | 0 | 547 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 79.122 | 81.167 | 92.974 | 0 | 0 |