CUI · 17281792 · J403572/2005 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
CNM PROGRAME S.R.L.
Str. Buzoieni, Nr. 8, Bl. M.41, Sc. 1, Et. 4, Ap. 30
BUCURESTI, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 51194
ANAF Live Status
Synced 15d agoInactivat: 29 Nov 2018
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- R🇷🇴Administrator
R**** N****
Revenue · 2016
4.4K RON
Net Profit · 2016
-10.6K RON
Employees · 2016
N/A
Equity · 2016
-18.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
BUCURESTI
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
51194
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- -68.03
- RE / TA
- -98.64
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.99
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4.351 -1.9% | 0 -100.0% | 19.130 +42.8% | — | 194 -74.2% | -18.936 -49.7% | — | — | 165 -72.6% | 29 -80.8% | — | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 4.351 -49.4% | 14.806 | 0 -100.0% | 10.455 | 10.586 |
| 2015 | 4.434 | 4.296 +108.6% | 13.399 +44.4% | — | 753 -18.9% | -12.646 -51.4% | — | — | 602 -33.0% | 151 +420.7% | — | — | — | 200 | 4.434 | 8.597 +34.7% | 0 -100.0% | 4.163 -50.7% | 0 | — |
| 2014 | — | 2.059 +11.2% | 9.278 +46.8% | — | 928 +319.9% | -8.350 -36.9% | 4.313 +109.1% | — | 899 +607.9% | 29 -69.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 6.380 -29.1% | 6.380 -29.1% | 8.439 -22.2% | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | — | 1.851 -36.4% | 6.321 +39.3% | — | 221 -55.8% | -6.100 -51.1% | 2.063 -35.4% | — | 127 -65.8% | 94 -27.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 8.995 +24.4% | 8.995 +24.4% | 10.846 +7.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | — | 2.909 | 4.537 | — | 500 | -4.037 | 3.194 | — | 371 | 129 | — | — | — | 200 | — | 7.230 | 7.230 | 10.139 | 0 | 0 |