CUI · 16212948 · J403611/2004 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
VISION DESIGN SRL
Str. MITROPOLIT ANDREI SAGUNA, Nr. 22
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 12934
ANAF Live Status
Synced 17d agoInactivat: 03 Dec 2018
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- E🇷🇴Legal Representative
E**** D****
Revenue · 2016
219.5K RON
Net Profit · 2016
-11.9K RON
Employees · 2016
1
Equity · 2016
-219.9K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
12934
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- -0.05
- RE / TA
- -0.39
- EBIT / TA
- 0.00
- Eq / Liab
- -0.28
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 219.495 -69.1% | 0 -100.0% | 779.697 +9.4% | 41.070 -39.7% | 518.275 -12.2% | -219.933 -309.7% | 1 | 38.318 -80.2% | 412.393 +13.5% | 67.564 +102.9% | 419 -39.3% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 244.034 -68.5% | 255.966 | 0 -100.0% | 11.932 | 11.932 +298200.0% |
| 2015 | 710.612 | 63.440 +853.8% | 712.942 +24.7% | 68.064 -54.3% | 590.507 +23.2% | -53.681 -192.1% | — | 193.967 +28.0% | 363.239 +20.5% | 33.301 +25.9% | 690 -58.5% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | 672.660 | 774.052 -48.5% | 0 -100.0% | 63.440 -95.8% | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | — | 6.651 | 571.789 -4.1% | 148.980 -25.9% | 479.420 +13.8% | 58.273 +106.8% | 6.808 | 151.539 +8.4% | 301.427 +67.8% | 26.454 -74.0% | 1.662 -22.1% | — | — | 200 +0.0% | — | 1.502.884 -23.2% | 1.504.061 -23.9% | 1.510.712 -22.0% | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2013 | — | 0 | 596.211 | 201.116 | 421.135 | 28.174 | 0 | 139.843 | 179.612 | 101.680 | 2.134 | — | — | 200 | — | 1.956.813 | 1.977.219 | 1.936.524 | 40.695 | 32.568 |