CUI · 15089686 · J4013242/2002 · MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
CETAS SRL
Sos. Iancului, Nr. 10, Bl. 114B, Sc. B, Et. 11, Ap. 94
București, MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI, 21724
ANAF Live Status
Synced 24d agoInactivat: 27 May 2019
Source: ANAF PlatitorTvaRest v9 (public API · no auth · daily sync). Covers VAT registration, cash-basis VAT, split-payment VAT, e-Factura enrollment, and fiscal inactivity.
People
1 representative- Ş🇷🇴Administrator
Ş**** R****
Revenue · 2016
153.9K RON
Net Profit · 2016
68.6K RON
Employees · 2016
2
Equity · 2016
170.5K RON
Registration
Contact
Tax Status
Address
București
MUNICIPIUL BUCUREȘTI
21724
Financial Health Score
Altman Z″ inputs · 2016
- WC / TA
- 0.59
- RE / TA
- 0.87
- EBIT / TA
- 0.36
- Eq / Liab
- 6.74
How is this calculated?
We apply the Altman Z″, a bankruptcy-prediction score published by Edward Altman for private, non-manufacturing companies. It combines four ratios — each captures a different aspect of financial health — and weights them:
Z″ = 6.56·X1 + 3.26·X2 + 6.72·X3 + 1.05·X4
- X1 — Working Capital / Total Assets · short-term liquidity.
- X2 — Retained Earnings / Total Assets · cumulative profitability.
- X3 — EBIT / Total Assets · operating efficiency.
- X4 — Equity / Total Liabilities · solvency buffer.
Thresholds (Altman, 2000): Distress < 1.1, Grey 1.1–2.6, Safe > 2.6.
The 0–100 score is a linear mapping of clamped Z″ in the [0, 5] range — a visual shorthand, not an additional metric. Hover any year on the chart to see the per-year breakdown.
Caveats: Romanian bilanț doesn't split liabilities into short/long-term, so we approximate current liabilities as 0.7·I7 (SME heuristic). EBIT is approximated with I16 (gross profit), since interest is bundled into I15.
Z″ over time
Distress < 1.1 · Caution 1.1–2.6 · Safe > 2.6
Financial Performance
14 years of reporting
All figures sourced from ANAF and Ministerul Finanțelor filings. Click any data point to explore.
2011 — 2024
Net turnover (revenue) & Net Profit
Assets × Liabilities
Balance Sheet Overview
Revenues vs expenses
Total revenues vs Total expenses
Since 2016
Avg. number of employees
Year 2016
Asset Breakdown
Raw Data
Raw Financial Data
| Year | Net turnover (revenue) | Net profit | Total liabilities | Fixed assets | Current assets | Shareholders' equity | Avg. number of employees | Inventories | Receivables | Cash & bank accounts | Prepaid expenses | Deferred revenue | Provisions | Paid-in share capital | State patrimony | Total revenues | Total expenses | Gross profit | Gross loss | Net loss |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 153.944 +50.3% | 68.556 | 25.306 -80.3% | 61.953 +2.9% | 133.820 -25.7% | 170.488 +52.3% | 2 | 0 | 40.289 +16.1% | 93.531 -35.6% | 21 +0.0% | 0 | 0 | 1.000 +0.0% | 0 -100.0% | 157.209 +65.8% | 87.069 +1042.8% | 70.140 | 0 -100.0% | 0 -100.0% |
| 2015 | 102.429 | 0 | 128.355 +238.0% | 60.225 +4.3% | 180.041 -49.2% | 111.932 -70.1% | — | 0 | 34.697 -76.1% | 145.344 -30.5% | 21 -67.7% | 0 | 0 | 1.000 +0.0% | 98.091 | 94.810 -45.2% | 7.619 -95.8% | 0 -100.0% | 4.602 -94.9% | 2 -100.0% |
| 2014 | 0 | 0 | 37.978 +71.7% | 57.758 +15.5% | 354.545 +12.8% | 374.390 +9.4% | 0 | 0 | 145.343 +82.5% | 209.202 -10.8% | 65 +261.1% | 0 | 0 | 1.000 +0.0% | 0 | 173.083 -0.9% | 181.960 +2.5% | 91.197 -23.4% | 90.763 +55.2% | 85.337 +60.5% |
| 2013 | 0 | 0 | 22.113 +21.2% | 50.000 +16678.5% | 314.311 -17.2% | 342.216 -5.4% | 0 | 0 | 79.656 +16.5% | 234.655 -24.6% | 18 +12.5% | 0 | 0 | 1.000 +0.0% | 0 | 174.668 -8.4% | 177.561 -8.1% | 119.071 +3.9% | 58.490 -25.5% | 53.163 -26.9% |
| 2012 | 0 | 0 | 18.243 | 298 | 379.708 | 361.779 | 0 | 0 | 68.370 | 311.338 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1.000 | 0 | 190.642 | 193.108 | 114.588 | 78.520 | 72.726 |